21st-Century Instructional Designers: Bridging the Perceptual Gaps between Identity, Practice, Impact and Professional Development

Afsaneh Sharif, Sunah Cho


The purpose of this paper is to discuss instructional designers’ current status through a brief discussion of the history of instructional design, comparison of instructional design models, and a presentation of a perspective on how instructional designers cope with their current identity and profession while seeking professional development. In this paper, we identified various reasons for addressing why professional development effort is less than ideal for instructional designers. These include a lack of priority given to professional development at an organization level, budget and funding, individual workload, and departmental visions and priorities. In order to address and overcome these factors, we recommend an instructional designer community of practice within institutions. As the landscape of education is constantly transforming, the designers’ field cannot stay static. To respond to all the changes, instructional designers not only need to strive for continuous learning but also to adopt a more collaborative practice, where they can share and exchange ideas and best practices.


instructional design; professional development; instructional improvement; instructional innovation


Academy of Teaching Excellence, Metropolitan State College of Denver, C. (2002). Course construction: ASSURE. ASSURE model. Retrieved December 12, 2012, from http://www.mscd.edu/~act2/courseconstruct/assure.html

Bichelmeyer, B. A. (2005). The ADDIE “model” — A metaphor for the lack of clarity in the field of IDT. IDT Record. Retrieved March 25, 2012, from www.unco.edu/cetl/sir/clt/documents/IDTf_Bic.pdf

Bloom B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.

Camm, B. (2012). Instructional Design and Rapid Prototyping: Rising from the Ashes of ADDIE. Social Learning Blog. Retrieved September 17, 2012, from http://www.dashe.com/blog/elearning/instructional-design-and-rapid-prototyping-rising-from-the-ashes-of-addie

Cheong, E., Wettasinghe, M. C., & Murphy, J. (2006). Professional development of instructional designers: A proposed framework based on a Singapore study. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(2), 197–219.

Clark, D. (1999). Bloom's taxonomy of learning domains. Retrieved September 10, 2012, from http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/bloom.html

Cox, S., & Osguthorpe, R. T. (2003) How do instructional design professionals spend their time? TechTrends, 47(3), 45–47.

Culatta, R. (2011). ASSURE. Instructional design. Retrieved June 18, 2012 from http://www.instructionaldesign.org/models/assure.html

Dick, W. (1996). The Dick and Carey model: will it survive the decade? Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(3), 55–63.

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. (2001). The systematic design of instruction (5th ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley, Longman.

Gagné, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (1st ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Gibbons, A. S. (2003). What and how do designers design? A theory of design structure. TechTrends. 47(5), 22–25.

Gibby, S., Quiros, O., Demps, E., & Liu, M. (2002). Challenges of being an instructional designer for new media development: A view from the practitioners. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11(3), 195–219.

Grant, M. M. (2010). Comparing instructional design models. Retrieved November 22, 2012, from http://www.slideshare.net/msquareg/comparing-instructional-design-models

Inouye, D. K., Merrill, P. F., & Swan, R. H. (2005). Help: toward a new ethics-centered paradigm for instructional design and technology. IDT Record. Retrieved October 18, 2012, from http://www.indiana.edu/~idt/articles/documents/Inouye_print_version.pdf

International Board of Standards for Training, Performance and Instruction (2012). Instructional designer competencies. Retrieved November 2012 from http://www.ibstpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2012_ibstpi_Instructional_Design_Competencies.pdf

Larson, B. M., & Lockee, B. B. (2009). Preparing instructional designers for different career environments: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(1), 1–24.

Learning-Theories.com (2012). ADDIE model. Learning-Theories.com knowledge base and webliography. Retrieved April 26, 2012, from http://www.learning-theories.com/addie-model.html

Lebow, D. (1993). Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 41(3), 4–16.

Lee, H. S., & Lee, S. Y. (1996). Dick and Carey model. Retrieved September 18, 2012, from http://www.umich.edu/~ed626/Dick_Carey/dc.html

Levy, S. (2003). Six factors to consider when planning online distance education programs in higher education. Retrieved August 17, 2012, from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring61/levy61.htm

Merrill, D. (1996). What new paradigm of ISD? Educational Technology, 36(6), 57–58.

Merrill, M. D., Li, Z., & Jones, M. K. (1991). Second generation instructional design (ID2). Educational Technology, 30(2), 7–14. Retrieved August 18, 2012, from http://mdavidmerrill.com/Papers/ID1&ID2.PDF

Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement – 42(5), 34–36.

Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2010). Designing effective instruction (6th ed.). Retrieved October 23, 2012, from http://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ygIbaClN3KMC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=Kemp+design+model+i&ots=7RwgO2EPPr&sig=zBt7T6fo2mHZmW-qAykn9INFUhU#v=onepage&q&f=false

Passerini, K., & Granger, M. J. (2000) A development model for distance learning using the Internet. Computers & Education. 34(1), 1–15.

Reigeluth, C. (1999). Instructional-design theories and models: a new paradigm of instructional theory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Reiser, R. A. (2001a). A history of instructional design and technology. In R.A. Reiser and J.V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall College Division.

Reiser, R. A. (2001b). A history of instructional design and technology: Part II: A history of instructional design. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 49(2), 57–67.

Richey, R. C., Fields, D. C., & Foxon, M. (2001). Instructional design competencies: The standards (3rd ed.). Syracuse. NY: ERIC Clearinghouse.

Rowland, G. (1992). What do instructional designers actually do? An initial investigation of expert practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 5(2), 65–86.

Schwier, R., Hill, J., Wager, W., & Spector, J. M. (2006). Where have we been and where are we going? Limiting and liberating forces in IDT. In M. Orey, J. McLendon, & R. Branch (Eds.), Educational Media and Technology Yearbook. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited. pp. 75–96.

Shrock, S. (1995). A brief history of instructional development. In A. Gary (Ed.), Instructional Technology: Past, Present, and Future. Englewood: Libraries Unlimited.

Skinner, B.F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 86–97.

Yusop, D. F., & Correia, A. (2012). The civic-minded instructional designers framework: An alternative approach to contemporary instructional designers’ education in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 180–190.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i3.2176


  • There are currently no refbacks.

 Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. eLearn Center

RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal is an e-journal edited by the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (Barcelona).

Creative Commons
The texts published in this journal are – unless indicated otherwise – covered by the Creative Commons Spain Attribution 3.0 licence. You may copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the work, provided you attribute it (authorship, journal name, publisher) in the manner specified by the author(s) or licensor(s). The full text of the licence can be consulted here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/deed.en.