Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Beyond objective testing and peer assessment: alternative ways of assessment in MOOCs
Abstract
MOOCs (massive open online courses) are an online teaching proposal that, in their short lives, have already thrown up two very different possibilities: cMOOCs and xMOOCs. Both are analysed in this paper from the perspective of assessing students’ learning. While assessment in xMOOCs is usually limited to multiple choice tests and sometimes delivering tasks, in cMOOCs the aim is to foster interaction from an educational standpoint, usually on the basis of peer assessment. Pedagogically, both models have their limitations. Multiple choice tests are mainly content bound while peer assessment has its own difficulties and drawbacks, which we explain here. We will put forward some useful ideas to give more flexibility to assessment in MOOCs (groups of experts, semantic web, portfolio, learning analytics), in an attempt to address educational assessment not as an end in itself but as another part of the educational process.
Keywords
References
Adell, J. (2013). Los MOOC, en la cresta de la ola. Retrieved from http://elbonia.cent.uji.es/jordi/2013/03/19/los-moocs-en-la-cresta-de-la-ola/
Barberá, E. (2006). Aportaciones de la tecnología a la e-Evaluación. RED: Revista de Educación a Distancia. Monograph VI, 1-13 . Retrieved from http://www.um.es/ead/red/M6/barbera.pdf
Bali, M. (2014). MOOC pedagogy: gleaning good practice from existing MOOCs. MERLOT. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10 (1), 44-56.
Booth, M. (2012). Learning Analytics: the new black. Educause Review Online. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/learning-analytics-new-black
Bondi, A. (2000). Characteristics of scalability and their impact on performance. In WOSP 2000. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd International workshop on software and performance. New York, USA (40-49). New York, USA: ACM.
Brown, S. (2013). MOOCs, OOCs, flips and hybrids: the new world of higher education. In ICICTE 2013. Paper presented at the Proceedings of IEEE International conference. Austin, USA. (pp. 237-247). North Carolina, USA: IEEE.
Codina, L. (2003). La web semántica: una visión crítica. El profesional de la información, 12(2), 149-152.
Daradoumis, T., Bassi, R., Xhafa, F., & Caballé, S. (2013). A review on massive e-learning (MOOC) design, delivery and assessment. Paper presented at the Eighth International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Interpreting Computing. Compiegne. USA: IEEE.
Davis, H., Dikens, K., Leon-Urrutia, M., Sanchéz-Vera, M. M., & White, S. (2014). MOOCs for Universities and Learners an analysis of motivating factors. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education. Retrieved from http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/363714/
Department for business, innovation & skills (2013). The maturing of the MOOC: literature review of massive open online courses and other forms of online distance learning. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/240193/13-1173-maturing-of-the-mooc.pdf
Dorrego, E. (2006). Educación a distancia y evaluación del aprendizaje. RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 6 , 1-23. Retrieved from http://www.um.es/ead/red/M6/dorrego.pdf
Downes, S. (2013). Assessment in MOOCs [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://halfanhour.blogspot.com.es/2013/05/assessment-in-moocs.html
Escudero-Muñoz, J. M. (1998). Evaluación Educativa: Aproximación general, orientaciones y ámbitos. In J. M. Escudero, M. T. González, & J. Del Cerro. Evaluación de programas, centros y profesores (pp. 4-22 ). Murcia: Diego Marín.
Fernández-Breis, J., Prendes-Espinosa, M. P., Castellanos-Nieves, D., Martínez-Sánchez, F., Valencia-García, R., & Ruíz-Martínez, J. (2007). Evaluación en e-learning basada en tecnologías de la Web semántica y procesamiento del lenguaje natural. Murcia: Diego Marín.
Fournier, H., Kop, R., & Durand, G. (2014). Challenges to research in MOOCs. MERLOT. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1),1-15.
Kolowich, S. (2013). The professors who make the MOOCs. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/The-Professors-Behind-the-MOOC/137905/#id=overview
Lewin, T. (2012). College of the future could be come one, come all. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/20/education/colleges-turn-to-crowd-sourcing-courses.html?_r=0
Linn, R. (2011). Test-based accountability. The Gordon Commission on the Future of Assessment in Education. Retrieved from http://www.gordoncommission.org/rsc/pdf/linn_test_based_accountability.pdf
Luo, H., & Robinson, A. C. (2014). Is peer grading a valid assessment method for Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)? Paper presented at the 7th Annual International Symposium. Emerging Technologies for Online Learning. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/conference/2014/et4online/peer-grading-valid-assessment-method-massive-open-online-courses-moocs
O’Toole, R. (2013). Pedagogical strategies and technologies for peer assessment in Massively Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Unpublished discussion paper. University of Warwick, Coventry. Retrieved from http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/54602/
Piech, C., Huang, J., Chen, Z., Do, C., Ng, A., & Koller, D. (2013). Tuned models of peer assessment in MOOCs. Paper presented at the International Conference on Educational Data Mining. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.2579
Prendes, M. P. (2003). Aprendemos... ¿cooperando o colaborando? Las claves del método. In F. Martínez Sánchez, Redes de comunicación en la enseñanza. Las nuevas perspectivas del trabajo corporativo (pp. 93-128). Barcelona: Paidós.
Prendes, M. P. (2007). Internet aplicado a la educación: estrategias didácticas y metodologías. In J. Cabero, (Coord.), Nuevas tecnologías aplicadas a la educación, (pp. 205-222). Madrid: McGraw Hill.
Prendes, M. P. (2013). Las aplicaciones educativas de la Web Semántica. In I. Aguaded, & J. Cabero, (Coords.). Tecnologías y medios para la educación en la e-sociedad (pp. 289-315). Madrid: Alianza.
Prendes, M. P., & Sánchez, M. M. (2008). Portafolio electrónico: posibilidades para los docentes. Pixelbit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 1(32), 21-34. Retrieved from http://www.um.es/gite/mmarsanchez/Proyectos%20y%20publicaciones_files/2.pdf
Ridway, K., McCursker, S., & Pead, D. (2004). Literature review of E-assessment. Futurelab. Retrieved from http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/19/04/40/PDF/ridgway-j-2004-r10.pdf
Salinas, J. (1999). Enseñanza flexible, aprendizaje abierto. Las redes como herramientas para la formación. EDUTEC: Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 10, 1-18. Retrieved from http://edutec.rediris.es/Revelec2/Revelec10/revelec10.html
Sánchez-Vera, M. M. (2010). Espacios Virtuales para la evaluación de aprendizajes basados en herramientas de Web Semántica [unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universidad de Murcia, Murcia.
Sánchez-Vera, M. M., & Prendes, M. P. (2013). La participación del alumnado en los cursos masivos (MOOC). Paper presented at the II Congreso Internacional de Innovación Docente. Retrieved from http://digitum.um.es/xmlui/bitstream/10201/39138/1/C156_mooc.pdf
Sandeen, C. (2013). Assessment place in the new MOOC word. Research and practice in assessment, 8, 1-8.
Tempelaar, D., Cuypers, H., Van de Vrie, E., Heck, A., & Van der Kooij, H. (2013). Formative assessment and learning analytics. Paper presented at LAK 2013. Learning Analytics and Knowledge. Leuven, Belgium.
University of Bristol (2013). Learning analytics and technology enhanced assessment (TEA). Retrieved from http://www.bris.ac.uk/education/research/sites/tea/publications/learninganalytics.pdf
Valverde, J. (2014). MOOCs: una visión crítica desde las ciencias de la educación. Revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, 18(1), 1-19.
Yuan, L., Powell, S., & Olivier, B. (2014). Beyond MOOCs: sustainable online Learning in Institutions. Retrieved from http://publications.cetis.ac.uk/2014/898
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2262
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal is an e-journal edited by the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (Barcelona).
The texts published in this journal are – unless indicated otherwise – covered by the Creative Commons Spain Attribution 3.0 licence. You may copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the work, provided you attribute it (authorship, journal name, publisher) in the manner specified by the author(s) or licensor(s). The full text of the licence can be consulted here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/deed.en.