Email this article 
Hide
Show all
A Cluster Analysis of MOOC Stakeholder Perspectives
Abstract
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are providing opportunities for thousands of learners to participate in free higher education courses online. MOOCs have unique features that make them an effective Technology-Enhanced Learning (TEL) approach. Institutions are offering a growing variety of MOOCs. Nevertheless, there are several crucial challenges that should be considered in the development of MOOCs, e.g., the drop-out rate of over 95% of course participants. One of the potential reasons for that is the complexity and diversity of MOOC participants. This diversity is not only related to the cultural and demographic profile, but also considers the diverse motives and perspectives when enrolled in MOOCs. This paper aims to cluster and analyze the different objectives of MOOC stakeholders to build a deeper and better understanding of their behaviors. Our main finding was a set of eight clusters, i.e., blended learning, flexibility, high quality content, instructional design and learning methodologies, lifelong learning, network learning, openness, and student-centered learning. This cluster schema creates a meaningful picture for the MOOC community.
Keywords
References
Arnold, P., Kumar, S., Thillosen, A., & Ebner, M. Offering cMOOCs collaboratively: The COER13 experience from the convenors’ perspective. In: eLeanrning Papers, 37, 63-68.
Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (Eds.). (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Sage Publications Limited.
Chatti, M. A. (2010). Personalization in Technology Enhanced Learning: A Social Software Perspective (Doctoral Dissertation), RWTH Aachen University, Shaker Verlag.
Coates, K. (2013). The Re-invention of the Academy: How Technologically Mediated Learning Will–And Will Not–Transform Advanced Education. In: Hybrid Learning and Continuing Education (pp. 1-9). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Cretchley, J., Gallois, C., Chenery, H., & Smith, A. (2010). Conversations between carers and people with Schizophrenia: a qualitative analysis using Leximancer. Qualitative Health Research, 20(12), 1611-1628.
Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3. Retrieved from http://www.jime.open.ac.uk/jime/article/viewArticle/2012-18/html
De Waard, I., Abajian, S., Gallagher, M. S., Hogue, R., Keskin, N., Koutropoulos, A., & Rodriguez, O. C. (2011). Using mLearning and MOOCs to understand chaos, emergence, and complexity in education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7), 94-115.
Downes, S. (2006). Learning networks and connective knowledge. Instructional Technology Forum: Paper 92. Retrieved from http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper92/paper92.html
Fernández, J. T. (2013). Professionalisation of teaching in universities: Implications from a training perspective. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 10(1), 170-184.
Gaebel, M. (2013). MOOCs Massive Open Online Courses. EUA Occasional papers. Retrieved from http://www.eua.be/Libraries/Publication/EUA_Occasional_papers_MOOCs.sflb.ashx
Hill, P. (2013). Some validation of MOOC student patterns graphic. Retrieved from http://mfeldstein.com/validation-mooc-student-patterns-graphic/
Kop, R., Fournier, H., & Mak, J. S. F. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on Massive Open Online Courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7), 74-93.
Kruiderink, N. (2013). Open buffet of higher education. Trend report: open educational resources 2013, 54.
Leximancer (2013). From Words to Meaning to Insight. Retrieved from https://www.leximancer.com/
Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 202-227.
Mackness, J., Mak, S. F. J., & Wiliams, R. (2010). The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning, 266-274.
Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Art. 20. Retrieved from: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2385
Mayring, P. (2003). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse, Grundlagen und Techniken (8th ed.). Weinheim: Beltz, UTB.
Peter, S., & Deimann, M. (2013). On the role of openness in education: A historical reconstruction. Open Praxis, 5(1), 7-14.
Richards, L. (1999). Using NVivo in qualitative research. Sage.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10.
Smith, A. E., & Humphreys, M. S. (2006). Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2), 262-279.
Watson, M., Smith, A., & Watter, S. (2005, January). Leximancer concept mapping of patient case studies. In: Knowledge-based intelligent information and engineering systems (pp. 1232-1238). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza, M., & Jakobs, H. (2014a). MOOCs - A Review of the State-of-the-Art. In Proc. CSEDU 2014 conference, Vol. 3, pp. 9-20. INSTICC, 2014.
Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., & Wosnitza, M. (2014b). What Drives a Successful MOOC? An Empirical Examination of Criteria to Assure Design Quality of MOOCs. In: Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on (pp. 44-48). IEEE.
Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2014c). Video-Based Learning: A Critical Analysis of The Research Published in 2003-2013 and Future Visions. In: eLmL 2014, The Sixth International Conference on Mobile, Hybrid, and On-line Learning (pp. 112-119).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2253
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal is an e-journal edited by the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (Barcelona).
The texts published in this journal are – unless indicated otherwise – covered by the Creative Commons Spain Attribution 3.0 licence. You may copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the work, provided you attribute it (authorship, journal name, publisher) in the manner specified by the author(s) or licensor(s). The full text of the licence can be consulted here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/deed.en.