Methodological proposal for the application of international benchmarking in order to assess the quality of virtual higher education

Renata Marciniak


This research focuses on providing a benchmarking methodology that allows any university offering virtual education (e-learning or b-learning) to compare itself to the best international universities in order to improve the quality of the virtual education offered. In order to verify the adequacy of the proposed methodology, it has been applied to the Polish Virtual University (PUW). On the other hand, the Open University of Catalonia (UOC) was chosen as the leading partner university. The benchmarking performed has allowed the author to obtain solid results in order to draw up and implement a complete action plan for improvement, which will make it possible to increase, in the short and medium terms, the quality of the virtual education offered by PUW. It is therefore concluded that the proposed benchmarking methodology is adequate in order to assess and improve the quality of virtual higher education.


benchmarking, virtual higher education, education assessment, quality of education


AUGUSTO, M., LISBOA, J., YASIN, M.; FIGUEIRA, J.R. (2008). Benchmarking in a múltiple criteria performance context: An application and a conceptual framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 184 (1), 244–254.

BENVIC (2002). Benchmarking of virtual campuses. Consultado en:

CAMP, ROBERT C. (1998). Best practice benchmarking: the path to excellence. CMA Magazine, 72(8), 10-20.

COBO ROMANÍ J.C. (2009). El concepto de tecnologías de la información. Benchmarking sobre las definiciones de las TIC en la sociedad del conocimiento. Zer - Revista de Estudios de Comunicación, 14(27), 295-318.

CONSEJO DE CALIDAD EN LA EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR (HEQC). (1997). Directrices para la Educación a Distancia. Gran Bretaña: HEQC.

DEVEDŽIĆ, V.; ŠĆEPANOVIĆ, S.; KRALJEVSKI, I. (2011). E-Learning benchmarking. Methodology and tools review. Consultado en:

FAZLAGIĆ, A.J. (2006). Intellectual Capital and Emberrenchinar. Poznań: Rys STUDIO.

GARCÍA ARETIO, L. (1997). Indicadores para la evaluación de la enseñanza en una universidad a distancia. RIED - Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia 1(1), 63-85.

KELLY, A. (2005). Benchmarking for School Improvement: a Practical Guide for Comparing and Achieving Effectiveness. London: Taylor & Francis e-Library.

MARSHALL, S. (2009). ACODE Benchmarks - eMM version 2.3 Concordance. Report to the Australasian Council of Open and Distance Education. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington.

RAINER, M. (2005). Competitive Intelligence. Berlin: Springer Verlang.

SARRAMONA J. (2001). Evaluación de programas de educación a distancia. RIED - Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia. 1(1), 1-24.

SLOAN CONSORTIUM (2009). The Sloan Consortium: A Consortium of individuals,institutions and organsations committed to quality online education. Consultado en:

SPENDOLINI, M. (2005). Benchmarking. Bogotá: Norma.

THE AMERICAN DISTANCE EDUCATION CONSORTIUM. (2003). ADEC Guiding principles for Distance Learning. Consultado en:

VUGHT VAN, F. A.; BALANSKAT, A.; BENNEWORTH, P.; BOTAS, P.; BRANDENBURG, U.; BURQUEL N.; BOER DE, H.; COYNE, D.; GAEHTGENS, CH.; GODDARD, J.; HUISMAN, J.; LEICHSENRING, H.; RUIZ, J. G. M.; WAGENAAR, R. (2010). Benchmarking in European Higher Education . A University benchmarking handbook. Brussels: ESMU.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

 Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. eLearn Center

RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal is an e-journal edited by the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (Barcelona).

Creative Commons
The texts published in this journal are – unless indicated otherwise – covered by the Creative Commons Spain Attribution 3.0 licence. You may copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the work, provided you attribute it (authorship, journal name, publisher) in the manner specified by the author(s) or licensor(s). The full text of the licence can be consulted here: