Email this article 
Hide
Show all
A comparative study of computer and mobile phone-mediated collaboration: the case of university students in Japan
Abstract
Web-based forums are the major form of asynchronous communication in online courses. They are considered suitable collaborative learning environments to conduct discussions among groups of learners (Lieblein, as cited in Lamb, 2004; Zhu, 2006; Swan, 2001; Palloff & Pratt, 2005). However, despite their relevance, web-based forums have been reported to be lacking when measuring the productivity of participants’ interaction. Although previous studies have suggested the use of Short Message Service in supporting online collaboration, little research has been conducted to understand whether mobile phones increase interaction in online discussions and how interacting via mobile phones differs from desktop computers. Thus, this exploratory case study examines online collaboration through Moodle forums on desktop computers and the LINE chat application on smartphones.
First, this paper compares how these two types of media influence the participation, interaction and collaboration of students. Second, it inquires into the students’ collaboration experiences, opinions, and difficulties they encountered during the online discussions. Finally, it explores the impact that these two types of media had on the students’ final outcome. Based on a literature review, the results of the content analysis of the posts and the experiences shared by the participants, this study concludes that mobile phones have great potential to enhance interaction in online collaboration.
Keywords
References
Asi, D., Geoff, M., Geoff, S., & Frances, W. (2010). Mobile learning shareable content object reference model (m-scorm) limitations and challenges. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Tribal.
Beuchot, A., & Bullen, M. (2005). Interactions and interpersonality in online discussion forums. Distance Education, 26(1), 67-87. doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081285
Beurer-Zuellig, B., & Meckel, M. (2008). Smartphones Enabling Mobile Collaboration. Paper presented at the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.399
Bishop, J. (2006). Increasing participation in online communities: A framework for human computer interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1881-1893. doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.11.004
Burnett, K., Bonnici, J. L., Miksa, S. D., & Kim, J. (2007). Frequency, intensity and topicality in online learning: An exploration of the interaction dimensions that contribute to students’ satisfaction in online learning. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 48(1), 21-35.
Burr, L., & Dawson, S. (2003). Codification of interaction within a large scale online forum environment. Paper presented at Educause 2003, University of Adelaide.
Fichter, D. (2005). The many forms of e-collaboration: Blogs, wikis, groupware, discussion boards, and instant messaging. Online, 29(4), 48-50.
Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analyses of on-line discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28(2), 115-152. doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1003764722829
Ingram, A. L., & Hathorn, L. G. (2004). Methods for analyzing collaboration in online communications. In T. S. Roberts (Ed.), Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice (pp. 215-241). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
Jahng, N., Nielsen, W. S., & Chan, K. H. E. (2010). Collaborative learning in an online course: A comparison of communication patterns in small and whole group activities. Journal of Distance Education, 24(2), 39-58.
Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2), 153-162. doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14703290252934603
Lamb, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). Want to be my "friend"? What you need to know about social technologies. Teachers Librarian, 34(1). 55- 66.
McCrory, R., Putnam, R., & Jansen, A. (2008). Interaction in online courses for teacher education: Subject matter and pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16 (2), 155-180.
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2005). Collaborating online. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Perry, M., & Brodie, J. (2006). Virtually connected, practically mobile. In J. H. E. Andriessen & M. Vartiainen (Eds.), Mobile virtual work: A new paradigm? (pp. 97-127). Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer. doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28365-X_5
Roschelle, J. (2003). Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 260-272. doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00028.x
Savenye, W. C. (2005). Improving online courses: What is interaction and why use it? Distance Learning, 2(6) 22-28.
Sorensen, C., & D. Gibson (2004). Ubiquitous Visions and Opaque Realities: Professionals Talking About Mobile Technologies. The Journal of Policy, Regulation and Strategy for Telecommunication, Information and Media, 6(3), 188-196. doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14636690410549516
Swan, K. (2001). Designing factors affecting students satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306-331. doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0158791010220208
Vonderwell, S., & Zachariah, S. (2005). Factors that influence participation in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(2), 213-230.
Wilson, J. R. (2006). Collaboration in mobile virtual work: A human factor view. In J. H. E. Andriessen & M. Vartiainen (Eds.), Mobile virtual work: A new paradigm? (pp. 129-151). Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer. doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28365-X_6
Wuensch, K. L., Aziz, S., Ozan, E. Kishore, M., & Tabrizi, H. N. (2008). Pedagogical characteristics of online and face-to-face classes. International Journal on E-learning, 7(3), 523-532.
Zhu, E. (2006). Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions. Instructional Science, 34, 451-480. doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-0004-0
Zirkin, B., & Sumler, D. (1995). Interactive or non-interactive? That is the question!!! Journal of Distance Education, 10(1),1-10. Retrieved from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/230/605
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v11i1.1898
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal is an e-journal edited by the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (Barcelona).
The texts published in this journal are – unless indicated otherwise – covered by the Creative Commons Spain Attribution 3.0 licence. You may copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the work, provided you attribute it (authorship, journal name, publisher) in the manner specified by the author(s) or licensor(s). The full text of the licence can be consulted here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/deed.en.