Challenges and perspectives for the open education movement in the distance education environment: a diagnostic study in a SINED project

María Soledad Ramírez Montoya

Abstract


The aim of this article is to present an analysis of challenges and perspectives through a project supported by the Mexican National System of Distance Education (SINED) and based on a successful case called the Regional Open Latin American Community for Social and Educational Research (CLARISE). The CLARISE for Distance Education project (2012-2013) seeks to generate knowledge on teaching models in accordance with distance education needs and a competency-based training approach, by means of networking activities that progress through three phases (diagnosis, training, implementation). This article focuses on the first phase. Having conducted a diagnostic survey of 40 participants from 9 Mexican institutions, it presents a descriptive exploratory study into 4 areas: identification data, the open education movement, distance education and innovation competencies, and networks. The purpose of the study was to devise the actions that would need to be carried out as a research group in the field of distance education. The challenges were identified in three areas: (a) institutional policies for open access; (b) knowledge management and communication; and (c) cultures of collaboration. The perspectives could be opened up by: (a) facilitator training for competency development; (b) innovative models with open access systems; and (c) mobilisation through innovation networks.


Keywords


open education movement, innovation, distance education, educational challenges, open access, digital competencies

References


AGUADO-LÓPEZ, E.; ROGEL-SALAZAR, R.; BECERRIL-GARCÍA, A. [et al.] (2009). “Presencia de universidades en la red: la brecha digital entre Estados Unidos y el resto del mundo” [online article]. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal. Vol. 6, No 1. UOC. [Accessed: 12 December 2012].

ANUIES (2001). Plan Maestro de Educación Superior Abierta y a Distancia. Líneas estratégicas para su desarrollo. Mexico: ANUIES

AMIEL, T. (2013). “Identifying barriers to the remix of translated open educational resources”. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. Vol. 14, No 1, pages 126-144.

ATKINS, D.; BROWN, J. S.; HAMMOND, A. (2007). A Review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) Movement: Achievements, Challenges, and new opportunities (Report for the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation). [Accessed: 12 October 2012].

BAAREN, J. van der; VRIED, F. de (2010). “How to Foster Sharing of Educational Resources?”. Open Ed 2010 Proceedings. Barcelona: UOC, OU, BYU. [Accessed: 12 November 2012].

BURGOS, J. V.; RAMÍREZ, M. S. (2011). “Movilización de recursos educativos abiertos: enriqueciendo la práctica educativa”. Revista Digital La Educación. No 146. [Accessed: 12 September 2012].

CABERO, J. (2008). “La investigación en la educación a distancia en los nuevos entornos de comunicación telemáticos”. Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, SOCIOTAM. Vol. XVIII, No 2, pages 13-34.

D’ANTONI, S. (2007). “Open Educational Resources and Open Content for Higher Education”. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal. Vol. 4, No 1. [Accessed: 10 December 2012].

D’ANTONI, S. (2009). “Open Educational Resources: reviewing initiatives and issues”. Open Learning. Vol. 24, No 1, pages 3-10

DAVIS, H.; CARR, L.; HEY, J. [et al.] (2010). “Bootstrapping a culture of sharing to facilitate Open Educational Resources”. IEEE Transactions On Learning Technologies. Vol. 3, No 2, pages 96-109.

DAVIS, V. (2010). “Questioning the Future of the Open Student”. Educause Review. Vol. 45, No 4, pages 22-28.

FACUNDO, Á. (2002). Educación virtual en América Latina y el Caribe: características y tendencias. Bogotá: UNESCO-IESALC.

GLASSERMAN, L. D. (2012). “Documentación de experiencias de una práctica educativa abierta (pea) en un curso de educación superior”. Revista Electrónica Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación (REICE). Vol. 10, No 2. [Accessed: 12 September 2012].

GUOHON, G.; NING, L.; WENXIAN, X. [et al.] (2012). “The Study on the Development of Internet-based Distance Education and Problems”. Energy Procedia. Vol. 17-B, pages 1362-1368.

GURELL, S.; KUO, Y.-C.; WALKER, A. (2010). “The pedagogical enhancement of open education: An examination of problem-based learning”. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. Vol. 11, No 3, pages 95-105

GUTHRIE, K. L.; MCCRACKEN, H. (2010). “Making a difference online: Facilitating service-learning through distance education”. The Internet and Higher Education. Vol. 13, No 3, pages 153-157.

LANE, A.; MCANDREW, P. (2012). “Are open educational resources systematic or systemic change agents for teaching practice?”. British Journal of Educational Technology. Vol. 41, No 6, pages 952-962.

NAPPA, N. R.; PANDIELLA, S. B. (2012). “Estudio y aplicación de objetos de aprendizaje a través del uso de recursos educativos abiertos”. Edutec, Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa. No 39. [Accessed: 12 October 2012].

MEDINA-RIVILLA, A.; DOMÍNGUEZ-GARRIDO, M. C.; SÁNCHEZ-ROMERO, C. (2008). “Formación de las competencias de los discentes mediante un diseño integrado de medios”. Eccos Revista Científica. Vol. 10, No 2, pages 327-357. [Accessed: 8 December 2012].

MINGUILLÓN, J. (2010). “When the mummy is digital: Preservation and dissemination”. Open Ed 2010 Proceedings. Barcelona: UOC, OU, BYU. [Accessed: 12 December 2012].

OECD (2007). Giving Knowledge for Free. The Emergence of Open Educational Resources. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OCHOA, X.; DUVAL, E. (2009). “Quantitative analysis of Learning Object Repositories”. IEEE Transactions On Learning Technologies. Vol. 2, No 3, pages 226-238.

OPEN EDUCATIONAL QUALITY INITIATIVE (OPAL) (2011). Beyond OER. Shifting Focus to Open Educational Practices. OPAL Report 2011. OPAL. [Accessed: 12 October 2012].

PERRENOUD, P. (2004). Diez nuevas competencias para enseñar. Barcelona: Grao.

PERÉ, N. (2011). “Cultura de colaboración: ¿qué implica compartir y utilizar recursos educativos abiertos?” In: Jornadas de intercambio docentes 2.0. Proyecto Sembrando experiencias de la ANEP. [Accessed: 5 December 2012].

RAMÍREZ, M. S.; BURGOS, J. V. (coords) (2011). “Towards a Culture of Openness in Education in Latin America”. eLearning Papers. No 23, 1-3. [Accessed: 15 December 2012].

RAMÍREZ, M. S. (2012a). “Academic networks and knowledge construction”. Revista Española de Pedagogía. Vol. 70, No 251, pages 27-44.

RAMÍREZ, M. S. (2012b). Preface. In: M. S. Ramírez and J. V. Burgos (coords.). Movimiento educativo abierto: acceso, colaboración y movilización de recursos educativos abiertos [eBook] [5-9]. Mexico: Lulú editorial digital. [Accessed: 10 October 2012].

RAMÍREZ, M. S.; BURGOS, J. V. (coords) (2012). Movimiento educativo abierto: acceso, colaboración y movilización de recursos educativos abiertos [eBook]. Mexico: Lulú editorial digital. [Accessed: 10 October 2012].

SALAZAR-RODRÍGUEZ, A. L.; RODRÍGUEZ-GÓMEZ, J.; CAMPOS-MADRIGAL, S. (2012). “Recursos educativos abiertos y estrategias de búsqueda e implementación en un ambiente de aprendizaje universitario”. Edutec-e: Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa. No 41. [Accessed: 10 October 2012].

SUGUMAR, R. (2009). Competency mapping of teachers in tertiary education. Retrieved from ProQuest. ED 506207.

TOBÓN, S. (2006). Formación basada en competencias. Pensamiento complejo, diseño curricular y didáctica. Bogotá: ECOE.

TUNING AMÉRICA LATINA (2008). Reflexiones y perspectivas de la educación superior en América Latina. Informe final / proyecto Tuning-América Latina-2004-2007. [Accessed: 11 November 2012].

TUOMI, I. (2013). “Open Educational Resources and the Transformation of Education”. European Journal of Education. Vol. 48, No 1, pages 58-78.

UNESCO (2002-2012). 2012 Paris OER Declaration. [Accessed: 12 December 2012].

WAISMAN, E. R.; OLIVARES, M. M. (2011). “Los desafíos de la inclusión digital en la formación de profesores”. In: Primeras Jornadas sobre Investigación y Experiencias en Educación y Tecnología en la Universidad Nacional de San Juan. La interacción en la construcción de la presencia cognitiva. Argentina.

ZABALZA, M. (2003). Competencias docentes del profesorado universitario. Madrid: Narcea.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v10i2.1719

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




 Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. eLearn Center

RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal is an e-journal edited by the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (Barcelona).

Creative Commons
The texts published in this journal are – unless indicated otherwise – covered by the Creative Commons Spain Attribution 3.0 licence. You may copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the work, provided you attribute it (authorship, journal name, publisher) in the manner specified by the author(s) or licensor(s). The full text of the licence can be consulted here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/deed.en.