'Fit for Purpose': a cohort-centric approach to MOOC design

Carolyn Elizabeth King, Kathleen Doherty, Jo-Anne Kelder, Fran McInerney, Justin Walls, Andrew Robinson, James Vickers


How do you design a quality massive open online course (MOOC) that will be ‘fit for purpose’? The Understanding Dementia MOOC is an initiative of the University of Tasmania’s Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre (Wicking Centre). It is an outworking of institutional commitment to open education resources (OER) and open educational practices (OEP). This paper describes the development of the university’s first MOOC, grounded in a philosophy that open learning design includes the criterion ‘fit for purpose’ and thus explicitly considers: the impetus for attempting a MOOC design; the goal (desired outcomes); the nature of the content; assumed capability thresholds of the intended cohort and; the technical and pedagogical design implications of the cohort’s learning readiness. The development team used a design-based research approach underpinned by an evaluation framework. This paper will discuss the interplay of factors which influenced decision-making, including the nature of expert content (packaged by the development team, translated by students and applied in individual contexts), the intended scope of influence, barriers to access in open learning design, pedagogical commitments including adult learning theory, technological constraints, as well as external stakeholder requirements. The paper concludes with a discussion of the impact of maintaining a clear purpose in making a specific body of knowledge available as open content. In particular, we suggest that considerations of content access are not simply physical or technical, but require tailoring the approach to threshold learning capabilities, as well as providing scaffolded content delivery such that individuals can translate their learning for their own contexts.


open learning design; MOOC; open educational resource; open educational practice; Understanding Dementia


Bady, A. (2013). The MOOC moment and the end of reform. thenewinquiry.com. Retrieved January, 2014, from http://thenewinquiry.com/blogs/zunguzungu/the-mooc-moment-and-the-end-of-reform/

Emanuel, E. J. (2013). Online education: MOOCs taken by educated few. Nature, 503(7476), 342-342. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/503342a

Graham, G. (2012). How the Embrace of MOOC's Could Hurt Middle America. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved January, 2014, from http://chronicle.com/article/A-Pioneer-in-Online-Education/134654/

Grimley, M., Green, R., Nilsen, T., & Thompson, D. (2012). Comparing Computer Game and Traditional Lecture Using Experience Ratings From High and Low Achieving Students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 619-638.

Authors (2013). Evaluation of a MOOC pilot: impacts on pedagogical, technical and research design Paper presented at the ascilite 2013, Sydney.

Kellogg, S. (2013). Online learning: How to make a MOOC. Nature, 499(7458), 369-371. doi: 10.1038/nj7458-369a

Authors (2014). Designing for Quality: The Understanding Dementia MOOC. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, Submitted.

Authors (2013). Something for Everyone: MOOC Design for Informing Dementia Education and Research. Paper presented at the European Conference in E-Learning (ECEL 2013), Sophia Antipolis, France. http://academic-conferences.org/ecel/ecel2013/ecel13-home.htm

Authors (2014). Online education: Targeted MOOC captivates students. Nature, 505(7481), 26-26. doi: http://academic-conferences.org/ecel/ecel2013/ecel13-home.htm

Kolowich, S. (2013). Georgia tech and Coursera try to recover from MOOC stumble. Wired Campus. Retrieved January, 2014, from http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/georgia-tech-and-coursera-try-to-recover-from-mooc-stumble/42167

Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a Design Science: building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. New York: Routledge.

Mackness, J., Mak, S., & Williams, R. (2010). The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC. Paper presented at the Networked Learning Conference.

Mitchell, S. L., Teno, J. M., Kiely, D. K., Shaffer, M. L., Jones, R. N., Prigerson, H. G., Hamel, M. B. (2009). The clinical course of advanced dementia. New England Journal of Medicine, 361(16), 1529-1538. doi: http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/georgia-tech-and-coursera-try-to-recover-from-mooc-stumble/42167

Parr, C. (2013). MOOC completion rates ‘below 7%,’. Times Higher Education. Retrieved January, 2014, from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/mooc-completion-rates-below-7/2003710.article

Penn Graduate School of Education Press Room. (2013). Penn GSE Study Shows MOOCs Have Relatively Few Active Users, With Only a Few Persisting to Course End. Retrieved January, 2013, from http://www.gse.upenn.edu/pressroom/press-releases/2013/12/penn-gse-study-shows-moocs-have-relatively-few-active-users-only-few-persisti

Sadler, D. (2012). How Australian universities can play in the MOOCs market. The Conversation. Retrieved October, 2013, from https://theconversation.com/how-australian-universities-can-play-in-the-moocs-market-9735

Waldrop, M. M. (2013). Online learning: Campus 2.0: Massive open online courses are transforming higher education — and providing fodder for scientific research. Nature, 495(7440), 160-163. doi:

Weller, M. (2013). Completion data for MOOCs. The Ed Techie. Retrieved January, 2014, from http://nogoodreason.typepad.co.uk/no_good_reason/2013/12/completion-data-for-moocs.html

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v11i3.2090


  • There are currently no refbacks.

 Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. eLearn Center

RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal is an e-journal edited by the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (Barcelona).

Creative Commons
The texts published in this journal are – unless indicated otherwise – covered by the Creative Commons Spain Attribution 3.0 licence. You may copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the work, provided you attribute it (authorship, journal name, publisher) in the manner specified by the author(s) or licensor(s). The full text of the licence can be consulted here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/deed.en.